Response to Franklin

The author did a great job of making a compelling argument. The argument is that a flashy understanding of science is compelling kids for the wrong reason. Most people do think that this hands on approach is much better for grasping children into the science field. In my opinion, the practical side of science is much more helpful for the understanding of science. Children or adults have a much stronger on science through the practical side rather than all theoretical. Museums like the Franklin are important for children. It allows the child to grasp science as more than equations. If it were not for museums like this, children would be pushed away from science. So, it is important that adults and children have an experience with science in a different way like the Franklin Museum.